Free Web Site - Free Web Space and Site Hosting - Web Hosting - Internet Store and Ecommerce Solution Provider - High Speed Internet
Search the Web

Reproducing the Velador Experiment

Home Experiment Goals FAQ Theoretical Thermal Refraction Measuring Thermal Refraction Lateral Beam Deflection Vertical Beam Deflection Measuring Beam Deflection Optimum Beam Section Laser Camera Support Beam Mount Filter Camera & Laser Cells Components Experimental Controls Cell Installation Assembly Photos Calibration Photos Measuring the Images False Signal Simulation Phase 1 Experimental Procedure My First Trial Speculation for Phase 1 Trial 4 Trial 6 Trial 8 Dr. Osadchey's 6-11-07 Trial Trial 9 Trial 10 Trial 11 Trial 12 Trial 13 Trial 14 Trial 15 Trial 16 Conclusions for Phase 1 Trial 18 Trial 21 Trial 22 Trial 23 Trial 24 Dr. Osadchey's 11-5-07 Trial Trial 25 Trial 26 Trial 27 Trial 28 Trial 29 Trial 30 Dr. Osadchey's 12/9/07 Trials Trial 31 Trial 32 Trial 33 Results for Phase 1-B Sidereal Index Links More Links Speculation for Phase 2 Trial 34 Trial 35 Trial 36 Trial 37 Trial 39 Trial 40 Trial 41 Trial 42 Trial 43 Trial 44 Trial 45 Trial 46 Trial 47 Trial 48 Trial 50 Trial 51 Trial 52 Trial 53 Trial 54 Trial 55 Trial 56 Trial 57 Trial 58 Trial 59 Trial 60 (Denham Springs, LA) Trial 63 Trial 64A Trial 65A Trial 65B Custom Rich-Text Page Custom Rich-Text Page

Simulating a False Signal

In an effort to understand differences between a real signal and a false signal created by thermal effects, I prepared a simple simulation of a false signal due to one expected cause – alternate heating and cooling of the support beam as it rotates in a constant radiant heat field.

 
          
False Signal Example, Case 1      
          
Variable Heating by Rotation in Unidirectional Infrared Radiation Field From a Plane Source
          
Heat Capacity2250.00W/C     
Expansion Coefficient0.001/C     
          
Interval 15.00s     
Horizontal Heating Magnitude30.00W     
Vertical Heating Magnitude20.00W     
          
  Horizontal DriftVertical Drift
AngleTimeLeft AbsorbtionRight AbsorbtionDelta Tdelta XBottom AbsorbtionTop AbsorbtionDelta Tdelta Y
000.000.000.0006000.030
301549.50-45.000.04012000.050
6030135.24-122.940.11018000.080
9045234.24-212.940.20124000.110
12060319.97-290.880.27130000.130
15075369.47-335.880.31136000.160
18090369.47-335.880.31242000.190
210105319.97-290.880.27248000.210
240120234.24-212.940.20154000.240
270135135.24-122.940.11160000.270
30015049.50-45.000.04266000.291
3301650.000.000.00272000.321
3601800.000.000.00278000.351
39019549.50-45.000.04284000.371
420210135.24-122.940.11290000.401
450225234.24-212.940.20396000.431
480240319.97-290.880.273102000.451
510255369.47-335.880.313108000.482
540270369.47-335.880.313114000.512
570285319.97-290.880.273120000.532
600300234.24-212.940.203126000.562
630315135.24-122.940.113132000.592
66033049.50-45.000.043138000.613
6903450.000.000.003144000.643
7203600.000.000.004150000.673
75037549.50-45.000.044156000.693
780390135.24-122.940.114162000.723
810405234.24-212.940.204168000.754
840420319.97-290.880.275174000.774
870435369.47-335.880.315180000.804
900450369.47-335.880.315186000.835
930465319.97-290.880.275192000.855
960480234.24-212.940.205198000.885
990495135.24-122.940.115204000.916
102051049.50-45.000.045210000.936
10505250.000.000.005216000.966
10805400.000.000.005222000.997
111055549.50-45.000.046228001.017
1140570135.24-122.940.116234001.047
1170585234.24-212.940.206240001.078
1200600319.97-290.880.276246001.098
1230615369.47-335.880.317252001.128
1260630369.47-335.880.317258001.159
1290645319.97-290.880.277264001.179
1320660234.24-212.940.207270001.2010
1350675135.24-122.940.117276001.2310
138069049.50-45.000.047282001.2511
14107050.000.000.007288001.2811
14407200.000.000.007294001.3112
147073549.50-45.000.047300001.3312
1500750135.24-122.940.118306001.3612
1530765234.24-212.940.208312001.3913
1560780319.97-290.880.278318001.4113
1590795369.47-335.880.319324001.4414
1620810369.47-335.880.319330001.4714
1650825319.97-290.880.279336001.4915
1680840234.24-212.940.209342001.5216
1710855135.24-122.940.119348001.5516
174087049.50-45.000.049354001.5717
17708850.000.000.009360001.6017
18009000.000.000.009366001.6318
183091549.50-45.000.049372001.6518
1860930135.24-122.940.119378001.6819
1890945234.24-212.940.2010384001.7120
1920960319.97-290.880.2710390001.7320
1950975369.47-335.880.3110396001.7621
1980990369.47-335.880.3111402001.7922
20101005319.97-290.880.2711408001.8122
20401020234.24-212.940.2010414001.8423
20701035135.24-122.940.1110420001.8723
2100105049.50-45.000.0411426001.8924
213010650.000.000.0011432001.9225
216010800.000.000.0011438001.9526
 

This simulation illuminated several important points.  First, thermal deformation can precisely mimic a real signal over a time frame of a few turns, under highly probable circumstances.  Second, I have discovered another potential artifact of my analysis method.  Even without actual reversal of image x-motion during each turn (e.g., from regular variation in the drift rate with no cooling or contraction), correcting for drift can still introduce an illusion of oscillation in the x-value of motion by exaggerating any variations in rate.  Third, this type of thermal deformation has two characteristics that can be used to differentiate it from a real signal.

 

Thermal deformation is time variable, and it is governed by the first law and second laws of  thermodynamics as well as conservation of energy.  Therefore, using a larger time interval should create larger magnitude swings for the same change in angle.  Also thermal energy should accumulate in the beam as a consequence of the first and second laws of thermodynamics, causing the actual drift to have parabolic and exponential terms (a cooling curve).  Control trials to look for these two effects in combination will be essential to the successful completion of my experiment.

 

A real signal will not vary in proportion to the time interval between measurements.  Rather, as the superimposed thermal drift increases, any real signal will ultimately be washed out by thermal drift, producing a smoother curve and smaller apparent signal amplitude.  A real signal will not increase in magnitude over a large number of turns (within the time limits described in my experimental plan), although a decrease in magnitude is possible due to drift correction artifacts.