Free Web Site - Free Web Space and Site Hosting - Web Hosting - Internet Store and Ecommerce Solution Provider - High Speed Internet
Search the Web

Reproducing the Velador Experiment

Home Experiment Goals FAQ Theoretical Thermal Refraction Measuring Thermal Refraction Lateral Beam Deflection Vertical Beam Deflection Measuring Beam Deflection Optimum Beam Section Laser Camera Support Beam Mount Filter Camera & Laser Cells Components Experimental Controls Cell Installation Assembly Photos Calibration Photos Measuring the Images False Signal Simulation Phase 1 Experimental Procedure My First Trial Speculation for Phase 1 Trial 4 Trial 6 Trial 8 Dr. Osadchey's 6-11-07 Trial Trial 9 Trial 10 Trial 11 Trial 12 Trial 13 Trial 14 Trial 15 Trial 16 Conclusions for Phase 1 Trial 18 Trial 21 Trial 22 Trial 23 Trial 24 Dr. Osadchey's 11-5-07 Trial Trial 25 Trial 26 Trial 27 Trial 28 Trial 29 Trial 30 Dr. Osadchey's 12/9/07 Trials Trial 31 Trial 32 Trial 33 Results for Phase 1-B Sidereal Index Links More Links Speculation for Phase 2 Trial 34 Trial 35 Trial 36 Trial 37 Trial 39 Trial 40 Trial 41 Trial 42 Trial 43 Trial 44 Trial 45 Trial 46 Trial 47 Trial 48 Trial 50 Trial 51 Trial 52 Trial 53 Trial 54 Trial 55 Trial 56 Trial 57 Trial 58 Trial 59 Trial 60 (Denham Springs, LA) Trial 63 Trial 64A Trial 65A Trial 65B Custom Rich-Text Page Custom Rich-Text Page

Support Beam Deflection Calculations

Support Beam Selection 

Selection of the support beam material and configuration is dependent on the expected self-weight deflection of the beam, thermal properties of the beam material, and the cost and workability of the beam material. 

 

Cost of less than $100 is preferred.  The beam should be of approximately 10ft (3m) length, light enough for a single person to lift, and be constructed of materials which can be worked to the necessary tolerances using only hand tools.  The bulk of the beam should be a single material with as uniform a cross-section as possible.

 

Maximum deflection of a beam under its own weight (self-weight deflection) is computed using Equations 1 and 2. 

 

The variables are:

 

δ = Deflection

θ = Angle of Deflection

W = Total Weight of Beam (Expressed as Force)

L = Length of Beam

E = Modulus of Elasticity of Beam

I = Ix = Second Moment of Inertia about x-Axis

b = Beam Width

h = Beam Height

d = Beam Diameter

 

For symmetric hollow beams, second moment of inertia is computed as I = I1 – I2.

 

Table 1 - Computed Beam Dimensions:

Beam Design

L (m)

D or B (m)

d or b (m)

h (m)

I (m4)

4”x4” Square

3.05

-

0.09843

0.09843

7.821E-06

6”x6” Hollow Square

3.05

0.1851

0.1270

-

7.605E-05

8"x8" Hollow Square

3.05

0.2105

0.1016

-

1.546E-04

6” Schedule 40 Pipe

3.05

0.1683

0.1541

-

1.170E-05

4” Schedule 40 Pipe

3.05

0.1143

0.1023

-

3.002E-06

 

Note: Wood beam actual dimensions are as listed under each parameter, and will not equal the nominal dimensions given in the description of beam dimensions.

 

Table 2a - Expected Self Weight Deflections (Vertical Displacement)

Material

ρ (kg/m3)

E (GPa)

W (N)

δCENTER (μm)

δEND (μm)

    

(End Support)

(Center Support)

Yellow Pine 4x4” Wood Beam

550

11.2

159.4

1345

3228

Yellow Pine 6”x6” Hollow Beam

550

11.2

298.1

259

621

Yellow Pine 8”x8” Hollow Beam

550

11.2

559.0

239

573

PVC 6” Pipe

1400

2.9

150.6

3280

7871

Carbon Steel 6” Pipe

7900

200

849.9

269

644

PVC 4” Pipe

1400

2.9

85.5

7258

17418

Carbon Steel 4” Pipe

7900

200

482.5

594

1426

 

All computed displacements given are in the direction of gravitational acceleration (vertical), and assumed constant.  Self-weight deflection (lateral or vertical) is initially assumed not to vary significantly with azimuthal rotation.

 

The predicted maximum laser beam deflection according to Osadchey’s original experiment is approximately 61μm over 180 degrees azimuthal rotation.  The maximum angle of deflection observed is 2” (two seconds of arc).  This is significantly smaller than the expected static deflections.  However, those deflections should (optimally) be roughly constant and may be compensated by adjusting the instrumentation accordingly at operating deflection.  For this reason, the angle of deflection at each end (where the instrumentation is located) is as important to calibration as displacement relative to the beam center.

 

Table 2b – Expected Self-weight Deflections (End Elevation)

Material

θend (')

θend (')

(End Support)

(Center Support)

Yellow Pine 4x4” Wood Beam

2.425

4.850

Yellow Pine 6”x6” Hollow Beam

1.422

2.845

Yellow Pine 8”x8” Hollow Beam

1.312

2.624

PVC 6” Pipe

18.038

36.075

Carbon Steel 6” Pipe

1.476

2.952

PVC 4” Pipe

39.917

79.835

Carbon Steel 4” Pipe

3.266

6.532

 

These values of end angle deflection under the beam’s own weight are all significantly greater than the expected effect.  However, PVC is the only beam material for which the laser beam deflection will be greater than 2mm with a support beam dimension of 15 cm (6 inches) or more.  This allows the laser position to be pre-calibrated when the beam is not under load without the beam drifting completely out of the camera’s field of view as the load is applied.  Deflection of less than 2mm under the applied load allows the camera to be calibrated off of the mount and then be installed and put under load without losing the beam’s position.  Note that both end deflections are not accounted for simultaneously.  Only the camera has to move for calibration after the laser is installed.